Awesome questions Greg! I’ll hit these one by one:

1. Although the reseachers say this will be a “low-cost” method, there is no actual number estimate they gave because this finding is really new, and just proven to work.
2. With this being a blood test it would be optimal to include this test in the process of more regular blood tests, or to be done with a small blood extraction procedure at your doctor. However there is an unfortunate possibility that this test could be just used as a more convenient way to diagnose cancer in a patient, but by using the same reactionary kick-start that I talked about in the article.
3. Definitely tons of parties have a stake in routine cancer testing- it’s gonna imply a huge shift of how we diagnose cancer. Not to mention that these technologies are very new, and need to be scaled up in order for actual use in the population.

Thank you for these questions, I really like them. I also hope my answers provide some clarity here!